• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Motion Control Tips

Automation • Motion Control • Power Transmission

  • News
    • Industry News
    • Editor Blogs
  • Controls
    • HMIs
    • PC-Based Controllers
    • PLCs + PACs
    • Stand-Alone Controllers
    • Software
  • Drives
    • Servo Drives
    • Stepper Drives
  • Encoders
    • Absolute Encoders
    • Incremental Encoders
    • Rotary Encoders
  • Mechanical
    • Bearings
    • Brakes + Clutches
    • Belt + chain
    • Couplings
    • Gears + Gearing
    • Lubrication
    • Shock + Vibration Mitigation
    • Springs + Rings + Seals
  • Linear
    • Actuators
    • Linear Motors
    • Linear Encoders
  • Motors
    • AC Motors
    • DC Motors
    • Brushless Motors
    • Gearmotors
    • Piezo Motors
    • Servo Motors
    • Stepper Motors
  • Systems
    • Conveyors + linear transport systems
    • Gantries + Stages
    • Rotary Tables
    • Grippers + End Effectors
    • Robotics
  • Networks
    • Connections + Sliprings
    • Fieldbuses
    • I/O
    • Sensors + Vision
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • Motion Casebook
      • Motion Selection Guides
    • Suppliers
    • Video
You are here: Home / Linear Motion / Artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions for sit to stand robotic chairs

Artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions for sit to stand robotic chairs

October 18, 2022 By Rachael Pasini Leave a Comment

People around the world, especially those with injuries or limited mobility, experience sit to stand (STS) difficulties in their everyday lives. Detailing just some of these challenges is an August 12, 2022 New York Times article, Embarrassing, Uncomfortable and Risky: What Flying is Like for Passengers Who Use Wheelchairs. The author described the discomfort, danger, and embarrassment that wheelchair users experience on airlines. Travelers with limited mobility often need two attendants to support them while sitting and standing in the wheelchair and moving in and out of the airline seat.

Two airline attendants lifting a person from a wheelchair to an airline seat
For passengers who use wheelchairs, air travel can be an embarrassing, uncomfortable, and perilous prospect. Image courtesy of The New York Times.

But travelers aren’t alone. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than one billion people live with disabilities, and 75 million require wheelchairs. Mobility challenges often create uncomfortable, dangerous, and embarrassing experiences for individuals at hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living communities, physical-therapy facilities, and even private homes. Limited mobility also prevents individuals from exercising to support their physical health.

Powered STS solutions are evolving to improve the global community’s comfort, motion support, quality of life, and longevity. The next generation of robotic chairs includes a new artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) approach, dynamic programming, single-axis exoskeleton, sensors, and reinforcement learning (RL) motion control. The goal is to use AI/ML to reach optimal cost/performance solutions for nonlinear, random STS environments and create building blocks for higher-level AI/ML exoskeletons.

State-of-the-art powered STS solutions

Powered STS systems help people with limited mobility and those who assist them in moving safely, comfortably, effectively, and independently. Their designs include kinematic linkages and actuators powered by motion controllers that automate the chairs to reduce or eliminate user muscle and joint torques required for motion. And their price points generally align with their mobile assistance abilities.

The Karman Standing Wheelchair is a state-of-the-art solution with advanced functionality and adjustability features for comfort and safety. It weighs 180 lb, costs about $15,000, and provides a standing angle nearly perpendicular to the floor; the latter requires minimal knee and hip moments to reach a fully erect position.

 

Motorized wheelchair in power life and manual lift positions
This motorized wheelchair from Karman Healthcare provides powered lift.

Lift chairs are commonly used as powered comfort chairs. They cost a few hundred dollars and are available in various reclining options. The reclining angle of the lift chair seat is limited to a partial stand position, which requires some user knee and hip moments to reach a complete standing posture.

A lift chair in the recline and stand positions
The Esright Power Lift Chair Recliner is a widely available powered comfort chair.

Powered seats, made by Carex, are portable lifting seats for use on sofas and armchairs. They cost less than $200 depending on their features. A typical seat has a limited lift angle that provides up to 70% assist lifting, according to Carex.

Powered cushion actuator in the lift position
The Carex lift seat is a portable STS motion solution.

RoboChair, made by SAAR, is a next-generation powered STS system prototype (currently not for sale). It monitors user posture for comfort and safety and includes AI/ML options for various applications, such as work, dining, resting, physical therapy, and routine exercises. This chair costs a few thousand dollars and is intended to support people in stationary or wheelchair versions. It’s designed for comfort as well as minimal knee and hip moments — and has wheels for easy maneuverability.

SAAR robotic chair prototype in sit and stand positions
The SAAR RoboChair prototype is the next generation of STS systems that uses AI/ML. (Not FDA approved, currently not for sale.) Image courtesy of SAAR.
Graph showing exponential price as a function of product positioning
STS solution prices typically increase as mobility assistance increases.

Robotic chairs with AI/ML

SAAR’s robotic chair has an aluminum base frame that supports a linear actuator, feet plate, seat, and back support. The seat comprises two parts: a front seat for thigh support and a back seat tip for buttocks support. The back seat tip remains parallel to the floor for safety and comfort during STS motion. The ballscrew actuator is fixed to the frame at the stationary bottom end and hinged to the front seat at the moving upper end.

SAAR's RoboChair prototype design
SAAR’s RoboChair prototype actuates the seat so that the seat tip remains parallel to the ground for comfort and safety. Image courtesy of SAAR.

The robotic chair includes wheels for easy transfer and motorized folding for compact storage and efficient transport. For improved performance, the chair also includes AI/ML and sensors that send signals such as force, position, and velocity to the controller in real time during STS motion. These signals give the controller information on the STS system’s stability, safety, and comfort and can result in actions such as actuator motor torque and sending the user warning signals. The controller can also compare information to performance data sets for people with similar weight, height, age, and medical limitations and output exercise rating feedback.

Next-generation robotic chairs should combine design simplicity with AI/ML readiness at various complexity levels. Their simplest version can be shaped like a chair with a single motorized axis and an adjustable link to yield up and down motion with a click of a switch. This solution can help people who experience discomfort and pain and rely on hand support, a forward posture lean, or assistive human support while sitting and standing. Getting to and from the chair may not be the problem, so simple assistive STS motion support may increase independence and reduce pain.

In its higher-level version, a robotic chair can be an assistive physical therapist. The chair can support people during repetitive STS activities at various start and stop angles while activating other limbs as part of their prescribed or recommended daily exercises.

A robotic chair can advance further and become the next-generation solution for people who cannot execute STS motion without human support. In this version, AI/ML technology monitors the user’s posture, controls the chair motion, and provides feedback signals to change the user’s posture for better stability and comfort during STS motion. This robotic chair can be an exoskeleton with one degree of freedom at the knee joint. Its most advanced version can be part of a complex exoskeleton system that provides STS motion and assistive robotic solutions for short travel gaits, extended travel wheelchair riding, climbing stairs, and resting.

SAAR's robotic chair with exoskeletal system
Next-generation STS chairs and exoskeletons will use AI/ML technology to monitor and control motion for better stability and comfort.

Reinforcement learning motion control

The motion of complex automated systems, such as exoskeletons and robotic chairs, can be controlled in different ways. Bang-bang (on/off) is considered the most efficient, while PID is the most common. There are also Kalman filters for random environments and fuzzy logic for nonlinear processes. Reinforcement learning (RL) motion control — part of AI/ML technology — is a relatively new approach that could be used for highly complex, nonlinear, random environments, which are expected in human-robot interactions.

RL Agents learn to optimize hundreds of neural network (NN) parameters using linear programming in a simulated environment. The program includes a custom Reward function for desired performance, which is determined by system modeling and validation. RL Agents perform the tuning process and employ Critic and Actor estimators of the total expected Reward for the process. Dynamic programming and the Bellman equation are used to optimize performance by minimizing the difference between the Critic and Actor total Reward estimates, which are functions of system States and Actions. States can be measured by force, position, or velocity sensors. Actions may include controller commands, such as motor torque or alarm signal.

STA robotic chair control diagram
During the AI/ML Development process, the desired performance is determined (1. Planning), a simulation optimizes the neural network parameters (2. RL Simulation), and the resulting policy is deployed to the real system (3. Operation). Image courtesy of SAAR.

Unlike PID, which implies proportional, integral, and derivatives of the error between actual and desired motion, the resulting NN control parameters may not be intuitively meaningful. Control engineers commonly use tools like Tensor Flow, Python, and MATLAB to optimize the NN parameters, then deploy the resulting NN Policy, which converts system States to Actions, to the real system’s motion controller. Since the simulation model may not be an exact representation of the real environment, engineers use trial-and-error with different RL Agents, Reward functions, and programming tools. The final resulting performance, which may have been difficult or impossible to visualize before the simulation, may make engineering sense.

Simulation testing

STS motion simulation control diagram
RL agents learn to optimize hundreds of neural network parameters using linear programming in a simulated environment. Image courtesy of SAAR.

In an STS chair simulation, an Actor was responsible for the Action of driving the chair actuator. The Actor received State variables and position error input and used the NN control parameters to output an Action, a control signal to the actuator. The actuator acted on the chair along with nonlinear (shock) and random (unexpected reaction) disturbances from the user’s behavior. As a result, the chair seat accelerated and yielded a new system motion State, including force, position, and velocity. The new State, which also implied a new user posture, entered a Reward function and together with the Action yielded a Reward. A high Reward was given for a safer user posture, a lower Reward was given in a warning zone, and a high penalty was given for unsafe slip conditions.

The calculated Reward was then fed to a Critic, which estimated the total expected Reward of the entire STS process for its NN calculations. The RL Agent took the estimated total rewards as a result of the Actor action, compared it to the total reward estimate from the Critic, and applied dynamic programming with a Bellman equation to change the actor NN control parameters and minimize the difference between the Critic and Actor’s total reward estimates. After a few hundred episode iterations in MATLAB, the Actor’s total Reward estimate converged to the Critic’s total Reward estimate. It implied an optimal posture, shown as an animated stick figure, where the user’s torso was vertical, and the user’s buttocks were positioned as back as possible on the seat tip.

MATLAB results from robotic chair simulation
During an RL simulation, MATLAB showed the convergence of the estimated total Reward (yellow line) and resulting user position (animated stick figure). Image courtesy of SAAR.

POC system testing

Proof of concept (POC) testing is an integral part of RL product development that starts with safety and stability testing and results in conceptual design changes. For example, the initial robotic chair model was unstable at certain seat positions, so the development team added a stabilizing feet plate to eliminate chair rocking.

Additional testing helped determine an optimal posture for stable STS motion, as the user tended to slip at about 45°. Adding fabric with a high coefficient of friction increased the slip angle but was not enough to prevent slipping. More testing proved that keeping the torso vertical to the ground and the buttocks as back as possible on the seat tip yielded STS stability. However, the user felt discomfort while sitting on the very narrow back corner of the seat. Therefore, the development team oriented the seat tip to provide comfortable buttocks support throughout the STS process.

POC tests also validated the optimal sitting posture and compared it to the simulated RL test results. A person with limited mobility tested the optimal STS posture on a regular chair and showed the opposite — buttocks toward the chair front, torso bent forward, hands on the chair seat for support. The POC tests of the robotic chair resulted in the same conclusions as the RL process simulation. The safest and most comfortable posture for STS motion in the robotic chair was keeping the torso vertical with the buttocks positioned as close to the back seat tip as possible.

A person tests the robotic chair by sitting and actuating the chair for different applications
Posture test results agreed with the RL simulation that keeping the torso vertical and buttocks on the back seat tip is the safest and most comfortable position while using SAAR’s robotic chair. Image courtesy of SAAR.

This example shows how AI/ML features may provide a competitive edge in product cost/performance and manage conflicting performance objectives such as maximum safety at the highest speed. However, the requirements for including AI/ML capabilities in product development may imply higher level engineering analysis, simulations, validations, and deployment, compared with traditional processes.

This article was contributed by Boaz Eidelberg, Ph.D., at SAAR.

You Might Also Like

Filed Under: Actuators, Linear Motion Tagged With: saar

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

LEARNING CENTER

Design World Learning Center

Motion Control Handbook

“mct
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Design Engineering Professionals.

RSS Featured White Papers

  • Robotic Automation is Indispensable for the Logistics Industry’s Continued Growth and Success
  • Reliable Linear Motion For Packaging Machines
  • Polymers Outperform Metals In Precision Gearing

Footer

Motion Control Tips

DESIGN WORLD NETWORK

Design World Online
The Robot Report
Coupling Tips
Linear Motion Tips
Bearing Tips
Fastener Engineering.
Wire and Cable Tips

MOTION CONTROL TIPS

Subscribe to our newsletter
Advertise with us
Contact us
About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy | RSS