• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Industry News
    • Editor Blogs
  • Controls
    • HMIs
    • PC-Based Controllers
    • PLCs + PACs
    • Stand-Alone Controllers
    • Software
  • Drives
    • Servo Drives
    • Stepper Drives
  • Encoders
    • Absolute Encoders
    • Incremental Encoders
    • Rotary Encoders
  • Mechanical
    • Bearings
    • Brakes + Clutches
    • Belt + chain
    • Couplings
    • Gears + Gearing
    • Lubrication
    • Shock + Vibration Mitigation
    • Springs + Rings + Seals
  • Linear
    • Actuators
    • Linear Motors
    • Linear Encoders
  • Motors
    • AC Motors
    • DC Motors
    • Brushless Motors
    • Gearmotors
    • Piezo Motors
    • Servo Motors
    • Stepper Motors
  • Systems
    • Conveyors + linear transport systems
    • Gantries + Stages
    • Rotary Tables
    • Grippers + End Effectors
    • Robotics
  • Networks
    • Connections + Sliprings
    • Fieldbuses
    • I/O
    • Sensors + Vision
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • Motion Casebook
      • Motion Selection Guides
    • Suppliers
    • Video

Motion Control Tips

Automation • Motion Control • Power Transmission

You are here: Home / FAQs + basics / What are functional safety standards for servo drives?

What are functional safety standards for servo drives?

January 18, 2017 By Danielle Collins Leave a Comment

Safety is a serious concern for machine builders, system integrators, and end users. Not only do they have a responsibility to provide a safe production environment, they must also meet regulatory requirements for machine safety. And of course, all of this should occur with minimal impact on operational efficiency and productivity. Fortunately, functional safety features in machines and systems allow both scenarios to be realized—mitigating the risk of injury without needlessly affecting production.

Designers of industrial machinery and equipment have to account for the fact that automated motion poses a significant risk of injury or damage. The aim of functional safety is to ensure that equipment operates correctly in response to its inputs. It requires a system to detect potentially dangerous conditions and to activate a protective or corrective device or command that will prevent, or reduce the consequences of, a hazardous event. To this end, drives play a central part in safety solutions.

functional safety
The first step in any functional safety analysis is to conduct a risk assessment to determine the required Safety Integrity Level or Performance Level. Image credit: ABB

Although the EU was the first market to mandate integrated safety functions in machinery, manufacturers around the world have begun to integrate functional safety features in machines marketed and sold outside of the EU. There are two primary standards that govern machine safety for industrial equipment—EN/IEC 62061 and EN/ISO 13849-1. Most equipment that includes integrated safety follows one of these two standards.

According to the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) website:

IEC 62061 specifies requirements and makes recommendations for the design, integration and validation of safety-related electrical, electronic and programmable electronic control systems (SRECS) for machines. It is applicable to control systems used, either singly or in combination, to carry out safety-related control functions on machines that are not portable by hand while working, including a group of machines working together in a coordinated manner.

According to the ISO (International Standards Organization) website:

EN/ISO 13849-1:2005 provides safety requirements and guidance on the principles for the design and integration of safety-related parts of control systems (SRP/CS), including the design of software. For these parts of SRP/CS, it specifies characteristics that include the performance level required for carrying out safety functions. It applies to SRP/CS for high demand and continuous mode, regardless of the type of technology and energy used (electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical, etc.), for all kinds of machinery.

So why do some standards begin with the prefix EN?

In short, the EN prefix designates a harmonized standard. That means it is listed under the EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. The Machinery Directive specifies essential safety and health requirements that all machines in the EU must meet. Harmonized standards include standards from ISO, IEC, and the European Union. These standard provide the technical specifications and procedures to fulfill the Machinery Directive requirements.

Comparison of EN/IEC 62061 with EN/ISO 13849-1

EN/IEC 62061 …

  • Uses the SIL (Safety Integrity Level) rating system to indicate the level of functional safety
  • Assigns a numeric score from 1 to 4, with 1 being the lowest and 4 being the highest; example: SIL3 (note that only levels 1-3 apply to machine systems)
  • Risk assessment for determining the required SIL level is based on severity of injury (Se), frequency and duration of exposure (Fr), probability of occurrence of a hazardous event (Pr), and probability of avoiding or limiting harm (Av)
  • SIL rating indicates the Probability of Dangerous Failure per Hour (PFHD) and the Risk Reduction Factor (RRF)
  • Takes into account both low frequency demand (i.e low frequency of a machine process or action) and high frequency demand.
functional safety
The four SIL levels defined by EN/IEC 62061 indicate the Probability of Dangerous Failure per Hour and the Risk Reduction Factor. Image credit: Wikipedia.

EN/ISO 13849-1 …

  • Uses the PL (Performance Level) rating system to indicate the level of functional safety
  • Assigns an alphabetic score from a to e, with a being the lowest and e being the highest; example: Category 4 PLe
  • Risk assessment for determining the required PL is based on severity of injury, frequency and/or exposure time to the hazard, and possibility of avoiding the hazard or limiting harm
  • PL rating indicates the system’s architecture (referred to as Category), Mean Time to Dangerous Failure (MTTFd), Diagnostic Coverage (DC), and Common Cause Failures (CCF)
  • Takes into account only high frequency demand
functional safety
This chart shows the relationship between Category, Diagnostic Coverage, and Mean Time to Dangerous Failure for PL levels under EN/ISO 13849-1. Note also the correlation with PFHD rates. Image credit: ABB

Note that the Performance Levels (PL) under ISO 13849-1 correspond to certain PFHD ranges — so can be cross-referenced to SIL levels from IEC 62061.

Functional safety is applicable to the machine and its control system, not to a specific component Share on X

When implementing functional safety, machine builders, integrators, and users are free to choose either standard — EN/IEC 62061 or EN/ISO 13849-1. But whichever standard is used, it must be used in its entirety, and the two standards cannot be mixed.

functional safety
Feature image credit: ReeR Safety Division

Remember that functional safety is applicable to the machine and its control system — not to a specific component or type of device. For example, a servo drive may include features and functionality that enable a system to achieve a specific EN/IEC 62061 or EN/ISO 13849-1 safety category, but the use of the drive itself does not confer that safety level to the machine.

Many drive manufacturers have published brochures or white papers addressing functional safety, and for good reason. While the concept of functional safety is relatively simple, the decision regarding what safety level should be applied to a particular machine or process is based on a complex mix of quantitative factors and qualitative assessments. Some manufacturers have even developed proprietary software to assist designers in determining what functional safety level is required and in choosing the appropriate components to achieve that safety level.

Article updated August 2019.

You Might Also Like

What’s the difference between PL and SIL machine safety standards?

What’s the difference between PL and SIL machine safety standards?

Read
How to get Functional Safety certification by using encoders on robot joints?

How to get Functional Safety certification by using encoders on robot joints?

Read
How do STO inputs affect SIL3/PLe conformity for AC drives?

How do STO inputs affect SIL3/PLe conformity for AC drives?

Read
What is the Machinery Directive and how does it relate to motion system safety?

What is the Machinery Directive and how does it relate to motion system safety?

Read
Improving safety design for machines

Improving safety design for machines

Read
What are typical drive-based safety functions?

What are typical drive-based safety functions?

Read

Filed Under: FAQs + basics, Featured, Servo Drives

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

LEARNING CENTER

Design World Learning Center

Motion Control Handbook

“mct
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Design Engineering Professionals.

RSS Featured White Papers

  • Robotic Automation is Indispensable for the Logistics Industry’s Continued Growth and Success
  • Reliable Linear Motion For Packaging Machines
  • Polymers Outperform Metals In Precision Gearing

Footer

Motion Control Tips

DESIGN WORLD NETWORK

Design World Online
The Robot Report
Coupling Tips
Linear Motion Tips
Bearing Tips
Fastener Engineering.
Wire and Cable Tips

MOTION CONTROL TIPS

Subscribe to our newsletter
Advertise with us
Contact us
About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy | RSS