• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Motion Control Tips

Automation • Motion Control • Power Transmission

  • News
    • Industry News
    • Editor Blogs
  • Controls
    • HMIs
    • PC-Based Controllers
    • PLCs + PACs
    • Stand-Alone Controllers
    • Software
  • Drives
    • Servo Drives
    • Stepper Drives
  • Encoders
    • Absolute Encoders
    • Incremental Encoders
    • Rotary Encoders
  • Mechanical
    • Bearings
    • Brakes + Clutches
    • Belt + chain
    • Couplings
    • Gears + Gearing
    • Lubrication
    • Shock + Vibration Mitigation
    • Springs + Rings + Seals
  • Linear
    • Actuators
    • Linear Motors
    • Linear Encoders
  • Motors
    • AC Motors
    • DC Motors
    • Brushless Motors
    • Gearmotors
    • Piezo Motors
    • Servo Motors
    • Stepper Motors
  • Systems
    • Conveyors + linear transport systems
    • Gantries + Stages
    • Rotary Tables
    • Grippers + End Effectors
    • Robotics
  • Networks
    • Connections + Sliprings
    • Fieldbuses
    • I/O
    • Sensors + Vision
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • Motion Casebook
      • Motion Selection Guides
    • Suppliers
    • Video
You are here: Home / Mechanical PT / Brakes + Clutches / More about what it means for servo brakes to have functional-safety certification

More about what it means for servo brakes to have functional-safety certification

December 18, 2020 By Lisa Eitel Leave a Comment

In the article What are functional safety standards for servo drives? we review how functional safety is quantified. Now consider one example of a spring-set pneumatically released friction servomotor brake now having a third-party safety rating (from Intertek Group) certifying compliance with international safety standard ISO 13849-1.

Intertek is an international London-headquartered inspection, assurance, product testing, and certification organization that issues functional safety standards to industrial products. Testing on these components is executed at more than 1,000 Intertek laboratories and offices across the globe. Spring-set power-off brake excel at locking servomotor-driven loads (and providing unbeatably safe holding) without consuming electrical power or exhibiting torque fade — plus provide far more safety assurance than holding a load with the servomotor … which can also overheat if required to hold an axis stationary too long.

The NexSafe Servo Brake from Nexen Group shown here has failsafe mechanical connections with the servomotor and gearbox; patented frustoconical friction-facing structures (with tapers on both the outer and inner surfaces) for simultaneous engagement with two mating surfaces; and optional sensors for feedback. These features along with industry-trusted spring-set operation of engagement allow this brake to deliver on the requirements of functional safety certification.

The new servomotor brake mechanically attaches to the servomotor via an integrated clamp collar with keyways that serve as a backup in the unlikely event that the clamp collar fails. The brake most commonly installs between the motor and a gearbox … and customized inputs and outputs are possible to complement the design’s exact configuration. When installed in the recommended configuration, the brake is Intertek-certified to operate at a functional-safety Category Level up to 4 and Performance Level up to e.

In fact, Nexen Group now offers three of its brakes products with functional-safety certification under its NexSafe trademark name. Shown here from top to bottom are a NexSafe Rail Brake (for installation on profiled guide rails on linear axes), NexSafe Servo Brake (for installation between servomotors and their gearboxes), and NexSafe Rod Lock (for installation with or on pneumatic cylinders). In fact, NexSafe brakes are certified to meet the ISO 13849-1 standards as described — as well as IEC 61508, ISO 12100, ISO 13850, and ISO 4414.

Safety-certified brakes adherent to standard ISO 13849-1 have a cycle life (B10D) of two million cycles and a common cause failure (CCF) of 75% — indicating a reliably predicable failure mode. Mission time (defined by ISO 13849-1 as the time between complete replacement or refurbishment) is 10 Years. Mean time to dangerous failure (MTTFD) is 100 years assuming the above B10D along with a H(op) value of 16 hours/day, a D(op) value of 260 days per year, and a maximum cycle rate of 74.8 seconds per cycle.

Category B
Performance Level a b
If DC is … 0% 0%
MTTFD (years) 3.1 13
Maximum average cycle rate (sec/cycle) 2.3 9.7
Maximum operation time (years) 0.3 1.3
Category 1
Performance Level b c
If DC is … 0% 0%
MTTFD (years) 31 40
Maximum average cycle rate (sec/cycle) 23.2 30
Maximum operation time (years) 3.1 4
Category 2
Performance Level c d
If DC is … 60% 90% 60% 90%
MTTFD (years) 23 17 63 37
Maximum average cycle rate (sec/cycle) 17.2 12.7 47.2 27.7
Maximum operation time (years) 2.3 1.7 6.3 3.7
Category 3
Performance Level d e
If DC is … 60% 90% 90%
MTTFD (years) 25 14 63
Maximum average cycle rate (sec/cycle) 18.7 10.5 47.2
Maximum operation time (years) 2.5 1.4 6.3
Category 4
Performance Level e
If DC is … 99%
MTTFD (years) 31
Maximum average cycle rate (sec/cycle) 23.2
Maximum operation time (years) 3.1

Diagnostic coverage (DC) depends on the level of brake redundancy along with its sensor setup. If DC is 0% no sensor feedback necessary. If DC is 60% then a feedback sensor will be required to monitor the brake’s operating mode. If DC is 90% then a feedback sensor will be required to monitor the brake’s operating mode of brake … and the brake must be cycled (engaged and disengaged) at least every three months to check for brake functionality. If DC is 99% the same applies and the brake must be cycled once every day to check for brake functionality.

Brake features to help achieve these levels of functional safety include:

1. Multiple engagement springs that default to lock.

2. Friction surfaces with a proprietary frustoconical friction facing — tapered on both the inner and outer friction surfaces. (Frustoconical indicates a truncated cone shape.) Those surfaces apply the braking (locking) force via springs concurrently to both the rotating shaft and brake housing to hold the shaft from rotating … all with zero backlash.

3. Up to three operating-mode sensors for feedback to ensure safe emergency stopping and holding. These are essentially inductive proximity sensors to sense three different brake conditions:

• Disengagement: This proximity sensor in the brake activates when rated air pressure enters the brake’s the piston circuit to essentially pull the friction-facing pair apart — for a disengaged (free-running motor torque) axis condition.

• Engagement: This proximity sensor in the brake activates when the piston and facing friction-surface pair move into engagement and application of braking (stopping) torque.

• Wear: This proximity sensor in the brake activates when the brake is engaged but the friction facing is worn enough to necessitate replacement.

The NexSafe Servo Brake shown here can include up to three sensors to monitor the disengagement condition, engagement condition, and wear. This feedback helps the brake satisfies the requirements for functional safety certification and deliver IIoT connectivity.
Shown here are several examples of brake arrangements possible with Nexen’s NexSafe Servo Brake components. Note the specific requirements for each functional safety category.

Nexen Group | www.nexengroup.com

You Might Also Like

Filed Under: Brakes + Clutches, Featured, Industry News, Mechanical PT Tagged With: nexengroup

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

LEARNING CENTER

Design World Learning Center

Motion Control Handbook

“mct
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Design Engineering Professionals.

RSS Featured White Papers

  • Robotic Automation is Indispensable for the Logistics Industry’s Continued Growth and Success
  • Reliable Linear Motion For Packaging Machines
  • Polymers Outperform Metals In Precision Gearing

Footer

Motion Control Tips

DESIGN WORLD NETWORK

Design World Online
The Robot Report
Coupling Tips
Linear Motion Tips
Bearing Tips
Fastener Engineering.
Wire and Cable Tips

MOTION CONTROL TIPS

Subscribe to our newsletter
Advertise with us
Contact us
About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy | RSS